-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
P3371 R4 Fix C++26 by making the rank-1, rank-2, rank-k, and rank-2k updates consistent with the BLAS #2028
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
P3371R1 Fix C++26 by making the rank-1, rank-2, rank-k, and rank-2k updates consistent with the BLAS (Mark Hoemmen, Ilya Burylov) |
P3371R2 Fix C++26 by making the rank-1, rank-2, rank-k, and rank-2k updates consistent with the BLAS (Mark Hoemmen, Ilya Burylov) |
P3371R3 Fix C++26 by making the rank-1, rank-2, rank-k, and rank-2k updates consistent with the BLAS (Mark Hoemmen, Ilya Burylov) |
2025-03-18 Library Evolution TeleconP3371R3: Fix C++26 by making the rank-1, rank-2, rank-k, and rank-2k updates consistent with the BLAS 2025-03-18 Library Evolution Hagenberg Minutes Champion: Mark Hoemmen / Ilya Burylov SummaryPOLL: We are unhappy with the behaviour currently specified in the paper “Use only the real part of scaling factor alpha for Hermitian matrix rank-1 and rank-k updates”.
Attendance: 17 POLL: Reverse the change for “Remove rank-{1,k} overloads without a scaling factor alpha (keep overloads with alpha)”
Attendance: 18 IL: We have some comments on the poll (in respect to moving away from status quo), so just to make sure, let’s take the poll again in the opposite direction (approving modifications proposed in the paper). POLL: Apply the change as proposed in the paper “Remove rank-{1,k} overloads without a scaling factor alpha”.
Attendance: 18 A: I think the overload might be useful. POLL: Forward “P3371R3: Fix C++26 by making the rank-1, rank-2, rank-k, and rank-2k updates consistent with the BLAS” to LWG for C++29 with a recommendation to make this a DR for 26.
Attendance: 17 POLL: Forward “P3371R3: Fix C++26 by making the rank-1, rank-2, rank-k, and rank-2k updates consistent with the BLAS” to LWG with a recommendation to apply for C++26 (if possible).
Attendance: 17 Next StepsPaper was forwarded for C++29 with a recommendation for making this DR for 26. As this is a fix, we also took a second (non-binding) poll that recommends accepting this for C++26 (if LWG’s queue enables). |
P3371R4 Fix C++26 by making the rank-1, rank-2, rank-k, and rank-2k updates consistent with the BLAS (Mark Hoemmen, Ilya Burylov) |
P3371R0 Fix C++26 by making the symmetric and Hermitian rank-k and rank-2k updates consistent with the BLAS (Mark Hoemmen)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: