x86/mpx: Fix instruction decoder condition

hansendc · KAGA-KOKO · commit 8e8efe0379bd · 2015-12-05T18:52:14.000+01:00
MPX decodes instructions in order to tell which bounds register was violated. Part of this decoding involves looking at the "REX prefix" which is a special instrucion prefix used to retrofit support for new registers in to old instructions. The X86_REX_*() macros are defined to return actual bit values: #define X86_REX_R(rex) ((rex) & 4) *not* boolean values. However, the MPX code was checking for them like they were booleans. This might have led to us mis-decoding the "REX prefix" and giving false information out to userspace about bounds violations. X86_REX_B() actually is bit 1, so this is really only broken for the X86_REX_X() case. Fix the conditionals up to tolerate the non-boolean values. Fixes: fcc7ffd "x86, mpx: Decode MPX instruction to get bound violation information" Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20151201003113.D800C1E0@viggo.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c b/arch/x86/mm/mpx.c
@@ -101,19 +101,19 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	switch (type) {
 	case REG_TYPE_RM:
 		regno = X86_MODRM_RM(insn->modrm.value);
-		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value) == 1)
+		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
 		break;
 
 	case REG_TYPE_INDEX:
 		regno = X86_SIB_INDEX(insn->sib.value);
-		if (X86_REX_X(insn->rex_prefix.value) == 1)
+		if (X86_REX_X(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
 		break;
 
 	case REG_TYPE_BASE:
 		regno = X86_SIB_BASE(insn->sib.value);
-		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value) == 1)
+		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
 		break;
 
