You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
David Rivshin says:
====================
drivers: net: cpsw: phy-handle fixes
This series fixes a number of related issues around using phy-handle
properties in cpsw emac nodes.
Patch 1 fixes a bug if more than one slave is used, and either
slave uses the phy-handle property in the devicetree.
Patch 2 fixes a NULL pointer dereference which can occur if a
phy-handle property is used and of_phy_connect() return NULL,
such as with a bad devicetree.
Patch 3 fixes an issue where the phy-mode property would be ignored
if a phy-handle property was used. This also fixes a bogus error
message that would be emitted.
Patch 4 fixes makes the binding documentation more explicit that
exactly one PHY property should be used, and also marks phy_id as
deprecated.
Patch 5 cleans up the fixed-link case to work like the now-fixed
phy-handle case.
I have tested on the following hardware configurations:
- (EVMSK) dual emac, phy_id property in both slaves
- (EVMSK) dual emac, phy-handle property in both slaves
- (EVMSK) a bad phy-handle property pointing to &mmc1
- (EVMSK) phy_id property with incorrect PHY address
- (BeagleBoneBlack) single emac, phy_id property
- (custom) single emac, fixed-link subnode
Andrew Goodbody reported testing v2 on a board that doesn't use
dual_emac mode, but with 2 PHYs using phy-handle properties [1].
Nicolas Chauvet reported testing v2 on an HP t410 (dm8148).
Markus Brunner reported testing v1 on the following [2]:
- emac0 with phy_id and emac1 with fixed phy
- emac0 with phy-handle and emac1 with fixed phy
- emac0 with fixed phy and emac1 with fixed phy
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/22/537
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg357890.html
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
0 commit comments