You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Only ->alloc_msg() should check data_len of the incoming message
against the preallocated ceph_msg, doing it in the messenger is not
right. The contract is that either ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg
which will fit all of the portions of the incoming message, or it
returns NULL and possibly sets skip, signaling whether NULL is due to
an -ENOMEM. ->alloc_msg() should be the only place where we make the
skip/no-skip decision.
I stumbled upon this while looking at con/osd ref counting. Right now,
if we get a non-extent message with a larger data portion than we are
prepared for, ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg, and then, when we skip
it in the messenger, we don't put the con/osd ref acquired in
ceph_con_in_msg_alloc() (which is normally put in process_message()),
so this also fixes a memory leak.
An existing BUG_ON in ceph_msg_data_cursor_init() ensures we don't
corrupt random memory should a buggy ->alloc_msg() return an unfit
ceph_msg.
While at it, I changed the "unknown tid" dout() to a pr_warn() to make
sure all skips are seen and unified format strings.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
0 commit comments