You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Nick proposed years ago that tmpfs should avoid clearing its pages where
write will overwrite them with new data, as ramfs has long done. But I
messed it up and just got bad data. Tried again recently, it works
fine.
Here's time output for writing 4GiB 16 times on this Core i5 laptop:
before: real 0m21.169s user 0m0.028s sys 0m21.057s
real 0m21.382s user 0m0.016s sys 0m21.289s
real 0m21.311s user 0m0.020s sys 0m21.217s
after: real 0m18.273s user 0m0.032s sys 0m18.165s
real 0m18.354s user 0m0.020s sys 0m18.265s
real 0m18.440s user 0m0.032s sys 0m18.337s
ramfs: real 0m16.860s user 0m0.028s sys 0m16.765s
real 0m17.382s user 0m0.040s sys 0m17.273s
real 0m17.133s user 0m0.044s sys 0m17.021s
Yes, I have done perf reports, but they need more explanation than they
deserve: in summary, clear_page vanishes, its cache loading shifts into
copy_user_generic_unrolled; shmem_getpage_gfp goes down, and
surprisingly mark_page_accessed goes way up - I think because they are
respectively where the cache gets to be reloaded after being purged by
clear or copy.
Suggested-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
0 commit comments