Skip to content

Resource Intensive for what? #37471

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
GGamerzz opened this issue Feb 14, 2025 · 4 comments
Open

Resource Intensive for what? #37471

GGamerzz opened this issue Feb 14, 2025 · 4 comments
Assignees
@starkillerOG
Labels
integration: reolink Stale The PR had no activity for quite some time, and is marked as Stale

Comments

@GGamerzz
Copy link

Feedback

Hi, just on the section about "Camera Streams", on the bit for "Clear* (High resolution, resource intensive)", what device has increased resources utilization,Home Assistant itself or the camera CPU?
Clarity should be put on this to inform the user what resources will be utilized more.

URL

https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/reolink/

Version

2025.2.4

Additional information

No response
@home-assistant
Copy link

Hey there @starkillerOG, mind taking a look at this feedback as it has been labeled with an integration (reolink) you are listed as a code owner for? Thanks!

Code owner commands

Code owners of reolink can trigger bot actions by commenting:

  • @home-assistant close Closes the feedback.
  • @home-assistant rename Awesome new title Renames the feedback.
  • @home-assistant reopen Reopen the feedback.
  • @home-assistant unassign reolink Removes the current integration label and assignees on the feedback, add the integration domain after the command.
  • @home-assistant add-label needs-more-information Add a label (needs-more-information) to the feedback.
  • @home-assistant remove-label needs-more-information Remove a label (needs-more-information) on the feedback.

@starkillerOG
Copy link
Contributor

Both, but mostly the camera CPU.

@GGamerzz
Copy link
Author

Should additonal clarity be stated to the user that additional resources will be used on both ends?

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 2, 2025

There hasn't been any activity on this issue recently. Due to the high number of incoming GitHub notifications, we have to clean some of the old issues, as many of them have already been resolved.
If this issue is still relevant, please let us know by leaving a comment 👍
This issue has now has been marked as stale and will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale The PR had no activity for quite some time, and is marked as Stale label May 2, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@starkillerOG starkillerOG

Labels
integration: reolink Stale The PR had no activity for quite some time, and is marked as Stale
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@starkillerOG @GGamerzz