Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
-
|
Hi @4lch, It should work now I think: What libvips version are you using? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi John, and thanks for the speedy reply ! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Sounds like you've installed the "web" libvips. It only has support for the common web image formats to keep the size down and improve safety. Try installing the "all" version instead. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
(but try not to use the "all" version for potentially hostile images!) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for looking into it ! I do not think I have any specific version installed, but rather I rely on the packaged version in NetVips.Native.win-x64. Should I instead setup the correct library where it is needed, if this one is the web version ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Ah looks like it's changed. I think you now need to install the libvips binary yourself if you want the full range of formats: https://github.com/libvips/build-win64-mxe/releases/tag/v8.17.1 You probably want: https://github.com/libvips/build-win64-mxe/releases/download/v8.17.1/vips-dev-w64-all-8.17.1.zip Unzip that and add to your library search path. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thank you so much John ! Will do 😊 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello !
I have recently found myself working with PPM (color) and PGM (mono) images. As they share the exact same structure with only the magic number differing, there is a generic file format named PNM (Portable aNy Map) that relies on the software to check the magick number to determine the number of bands in the image. ImageMagick supports this format out of the box for example.
As Vips already supports PPM and PGM (as well as PBM ?), I feel like this could be useful and probably not too hard to implement for the odd use case in which it is more convenient to use a unified extension.
Thanks in advance for the consideration ! :)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions