Closed
Description
@jcupitt @f1ac is it possible #2815 caused a regression in terms of the compressed filesize?
> vips jxlsave photo-1595841696677-6489ff3f8cd1.jpeg photo-1595841696677-6489ff3f8cd1_direct.jxl
> vips -v
vips-8.12.2-Tue Jan 25 09:34:32 UTC 2022
> ll photo-1595841696677-6489ff3f8cd1_direct.jxl
-rw-r--r-- 1 richardmonette staff 337549 17 Jun 12:49 photo-1595841696677-6489ff3f8cd1_direct.jxl
when I run against 8.12.2 it appears saving a JXL is about 338kb whereas when I build and run against 6260a37 (from https://github.com/libvips/libvips/archive/6260a37136973f3d231d0e2c28af6190126c664e.tar.gz) the filesize jumps to about 931kb.
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels