Skip to content

Add webp support #65

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
sbalay opened this issue Apr 14, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Add webp support #65

sbalay opened this issue Apr 14, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@sbalay
Copy link

sbalay commented Apr 14, 2015

Is there a chance to add to this gem support to webp image format?
libvips already has support for it.

@jcupitt
Copy link
Member

jcupitt commented Apr 15, 2015

If it's not too much work. I'll have a look.

@tommasop
Copy link

+1

jcupitt added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 24, 2015
see #65

I've updated the bundle and broken rspec, this needs fixing

we should probably have webp read as well I guess
@jcupitt
Copy link
Member

jcupitt commented Jun 24, 2015

git master now has webp write.

I've updated the bundle and broken rspec support, this needs fixing.

Would webp read support be useful too?

Theres a new ruby binding here, if you've not seen it:

https://github.com/jcupitt/gir_ffi-vips

The new one is written in Ruby using gir_ffi and is quite a bit better. It has full webp support already, including write to and from memory buffers. It does leak slightly unfortunately, about 20 bytes per operation call.

@jcupitt
Copy link
Member

jcupitt commented Jan 18, 2016

There's a new version of the ruby-vips gem with this feature in, I'll close.

The current best vips8 Ruby binding is here:

https://github.com/jcupitt/ruby-vips8

@jcupitt jcupitt closed this as completed Jan 18, 2016
oleksandrbyk added a commit to oleksandrbyk/olek-ruby-vips that referenced this issue Feb 6, 2019
see libvips/ruby-vips#65

I've updated the bundle and broken rspec, this needs fixing

we should probably have webp read as well I guess
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants