I am working on this issue.

Why do we want to remove them rather than making them more accurate?

Can we at least preserve 'codex' for the search functionality?

We can certainly make them more accurate instead of removing them; my point is more that right now they are totally uninformative (except for "codex").

I find "codex" very jargony. Also, you have to read the heading of the search result site to know about it. I bet most of the users only use the search field in the side bar and then look through the results.

What I would find more usable is

1. have different symbols for different result categories (example, tutorial, api ...)
2. A filter on the result categories

But that's going into sphinx, and I don't have time for that.

If you want to keep keywords for serach (?) reasons, can we make them invisible to the user? IMHO the don't have a benefit for the reader of the example and thus are only clutter.

I have an idea of how to implement that, but it's tied to our hosting issues. We can maybe discuss on the call when I have the budget drawn up.

If you want to keep keywords for serach (?) reasons, can we make them invisible to the user? IMHO the don't have a benefit for the reader of the example and thus are only clutter.

sphinx allows a meta directive that can contain keywords, which will go in the html meta rather than printed on the page. Given that we are injecting these somehow, I'm sure we could instead inject them to the meta directive.

The cheapest way is probably to make the text white. Maybe that's a good hack until we come up with something better.