Skip to content

Codecov instead of coveralls? #7244

Closed
Closed
@QuLogic

Description

@QuLogic

This was briefly discussed on gitter, but I'm not sure how much exposure that discussion had. I'm posting it here just in case others might want to weigh in.

@njsmith:

I just switched from coveralls to codecov and am pretty happy
fyi
(some advantages: pretty plots, combining coverage from different python versions / languages actually seems to work which I could never manage with coveralls)

@jenshnielsen:

@njsmith I spent a long time fighting with both codecov and coveralls. In the end we could only get coveralls to work correctly with our nose setup. Once we deprecate nose and replace it with PyTest we will likely switch to codecov

@njsmith:

Ah, interesting. It's true, I'm using pytest on the relevant packages

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions