-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7.9k
slightly inaccurate plot(".") vs plot("-") positioning #7624
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
This issue has been marked "inactive" because it has been 365 days since the last comment. If this issue is still present in recent Matplotlib releases, or the feature request is still wanted, please leave a comment and this label will be removed. If there are no updates in another 30 days, this issue will be automatically closed, but you are free to re-open or create a new issue if needed. We value issue reports, and this procedure is meant to help us resurface and prioritize issues that have not been addressed yet, not make them disappear. Thanks for your help! |
(also fixed by mplcairo; even if that's not exactly the same as #7262 it's probably some variant...) |
Yes, I agree that there is a one-pixel offset at any resolution. The line is one pixel higher than the center of the markers, even with |
BTW, not sure if this is our issue or Agg's. I would tend to guess maybe Agg, but perhaps we do some messing with the marker positions? |
This issue has been marked "inactive" because it has been 365 days since the last comment. If this issue is still present in recent Matplotlib releases, or the feature request is still wanted, please leave a comment and this label will be removed. If there are no updates in another 30 days, this issue will be automatically closed, but you are free to re-open or create a new issue if needed. We value issue reports, and this procedure is meant to help us resurface and prioritize issues that have not been addressed yet, not make them disappear. Thanks for your help! |
gives

Note that the line is clearly drawn a bit higher on average than the dots.
I thought this was a duplicate of #7262 but actually it is not, this issue is present even in 1.3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: