You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It is a somewhat well-known issue (#4679) that seaborn's styles make "+", "x" markers invisible by default (because they set lines.markeredgewidth to zero). Although it may be helpful to use a separate rcparam to control such markers, this is not trivial (see linked issue). Instead, in this issue, I'd like to argue that matplotlib should not ship styles available by default where some markers are completely invisible; instead, we may e.g. set lines.markeredgewidth to a tiny value, so that the markers are at least faintly visible (and it may be easier to realize where the issue comes from), even though it is not strictly equivalent to the "official" seaborn style.
From simple attempts, it seems that a value like 0.25 should be enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think this can be handled once #8479 lands by setting markeredgecolor to "auto", as per de7bc93, and then setting marker edge widths to any reasonable nonzero value.
It is a somewhat well-known issue (#4679) that seaborn's styles make "+", "x" markers invisible by default (because they set
lines.markeredgewidth
to zero). Although it may be helpful to use a separate rcparam to control such markers, this is not trivial (see linked issue). Instead, in this issue, I'd like to argue that matplotlib should not ship styles available by default where some markers are completely invisible; instead, we may e.g. setlines.markeredgewidth
to a tiny value, so that the markers are at least faintly visible (and it may be easier to realize where the issue comes from), even though it is not strictly equivalent to the "official" seaborn style.From simple attempts, it seems that a value like 0.25 should be enough.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: