Skip to content

Figure sizing problems in most backends #916

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
efiring opened this issue Jun 1, 2012 · 4 comments
Closed

Figure sizing problems in most backends #916

efiring opened this issue Jun 1, 2012 · 4 comments

Comments

@efiring
Copy link
Member

efiring commented Jun 1, 2012

#756 fixed a problem in the qt4agg backend, but the discussion revealed that the various backends behave erratically under various methods of setting or re-setting figure dimensions.

@bilderbuchi
Copy link

I can confirm this. My figures are never the size I specified. This is easy to confirm by comparing the supplied figsize with e.g. the paper/page size of a generated pdf.

@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

@efiring Is this still a problem?

@efiring
Copy link
Member Author

efiring commented Jan 16, 2014

@tacaswell I'm not aware of any changes that address this, so I assume it is still a problem. It might be related to #2716, although that is said to depend on both backend and platform.

@tacaswell tacaswell modified the milestones: 2.1 (next point release), 2.2 (next next feature release), unassigned Sep 24, 2017
@jklymak
Copy link
Member

jklymak commented Feb 26, 2020

I'm not aware of current problems withs sizing figures, though there may be some. Lets close this in favour of more recent reports...

@jklymak jklymak closed this as completed Feb 26, 2020
@story645 story645 removed this from the future releases milestone Oct 6, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants