Skip to content

Proof of concept for deprecation of global non-callables. #10735

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

@anntzer anntzer commented Mar 9, 2018

Triggered by the recent discussion on deprecating matplotlib.verbose.

This ensures that a deprecation warning is triggered just by trying to
access matplotlib.verbose (or importing it). The implementation idea is
based on njsmith's metamodule, but without the hacks needed to support
Py<3.5.

Py3.7+ will provide instance-__getattr__ on all classes by default,
making the _DeprecatorModuleType patching unnecessary (but the warning
emitter would still need to be implemented, so there is actually fairly
limited improvement from that).

Just putting this here to show that it can be done... attn @jklymak

PR Summary

PR Checklist

  • Has Pytest style unit tests
  • Code is PEP 8 compliant
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant
  • Added an entry to doc/users/next_whats_new/ if major new feature (follow instructions in README.rst there)
  • Documented in doc/api/api_changes.rst if API changed in a backward-incompatible way

Triggered by the recent discussion on deprecating matplotlib.verbose.

This ensures that a deprecation warning is triggered just by trying to
access matplotlib.verbose (or importing it).  The implementation idea is
based on njsmith's metamodule, but without the hacks needed to support
Py<3.5.

Py3.7+ will provide instance-`__getattr__` on all classes by default,
making the `_DeprecatorModuleType` patching unnecessary (but the warning
emitter would still need to be implemented, so there is actually fairly
limited improvement from that).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant