Skip to content

Compress comments in make_image. #21213

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 29, 2021
Merged

Conversation

anntzer
Copy link
Contributor

@anntzer anntzer commented Sep 28, 2021

make_image is a huge function; shorten it (in physical screen space) a
bit by rewriting/rewrapping some comments, and a few small stylistic
changes.

PR Summary

PR Checklist

  • Has pytest style unit tests (and pytest passes).
  • Is Flake 8 compliant (run flake8 on changed files to check).
  • New features are documented, with examples if plot related.
  • Documentation is sphinx and numpydoc compliant (the docs should build without error).
  • Conforms to Matplotlib style conventions (install flake8-docstrings and run flake8 --docstring-convention=all).
  • New features have an entry in doc/users/next_whats_new/ (follow instructions in README.rst there).
  • API changes documented in doc/api/next_api_changes/ (follow instructions in README.rst there).

make_image is a huge function; shorten it (in physical screen space) a
bit by rewriting/rewrapping some comments, and a few small stylistic
changes.
@tacaswell tacaswell added this to the v3.6.0 milestone Sep 29, 2021
@tacaswell tacaswell merged commit 2023423 into matplotlib:master Sep 29, 2021
@anntzer anntzer deleted the make_image branch September 29, 2021 15:58
tacaswell added a commit to tacaswell/matplotlib that referenced this pull request Oct 12, 2021
DOC: Compress comments in make_image.
tacaswell added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2021
DOC: Compress comments in make_image.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants