meta: remove collaborator self-nomination

Trott · aduh95 · commit d0c96c463c0c · 2025-03-23T11:42:42.000+01:00
Anyone with sufficient involvement in Node.js such that becoming a collaborator would benefit Node.js, is going to have plenty of people to ask. The self-nomination process has been entirely superfluous the entire time I've been involved in Node.js. Simplify things and get rid of it. PR-URL: #57537 Reviewed-By: Ruben Bridgewater <ruben@bridgewater.de> Reviewed-By: Marco Ippolito <marcoippolito54@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de> Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com> Reviewed-By: Yagiz Nizipli <yagiz@nizipli.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ruy Adorno <ruy@vlt.sh> Reviewed-By: Rafael Gonzaga <rafael.nunu@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jordan Harband <ljharb@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Ulises Gascón <ulisesgascongonzalez@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Darshan Sen <raisinten@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Paolo Insogna <paolo@cowtech.it> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Edy Silva <edigleyssonsilva@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com>
diff --git a/GOVERNANCE.md b/GOVERNANCE.md
@@ -194,10 +194,6 @@ nominee publicly accepts it. In the case
 of an objection, the TSC is responsible for working with the individuals
 involved and finding a resolution.
 
-Collaborators might overlook someone with valuable contributions. In that case,
-the contributor may open an issue or contact a collaborator to request a
-nomination.
-
 #### How to review a collaborator nomination
 
 A collaborator nomination can be reviewed in the same way one would review a PR
