|
| 1 | +================================================================================== |
| 2 | +NEP 29 — Recommend Python and Numpy version support as a community policy standard |
| 3 | +================================================================================== |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +:Author: Thomas A Caswell <tcaswell@gmail.com>, Andreas Mueller, Brian Granger, Madicken Munk, Ralf Gommers, Matt Haberland <mhaberla@calpoly.edu>, Matthias Bussonnier <bussonniermatthias@gmail.com>, Stefan van der Walt |
| 7 | +:Status: Draft |
| 8 | +:Type: Informational Track |
| 9 | +:Created: 2019-07-13 |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +Abstract |
| 13 | +-------- |
| 14 | + |
| 15 | +This NEP recommends and encourages all projects across the Scientific |
| 16 | +Python ecosystem to adopt a common "time window-based" policy for |
| 17 | +support of Python and NumPy versions. Standardizing a recommendation |
| 18 | +for project support of minimum Python and NumPy versions will improve |
| 19 | +downstream project planning. |
| 20 | + |
| 21 | +This is an unusual NEP in that it offers recommendations for |
| 22 | +community-wide policy and not for changes to NumPy itself. Since a |
| 23 | +common place for SPEEPs (Scientific Python Ecosystem Enhancement |
| 24 | +Proposals) does not exist and given NumPy's central role in the |
| 25 | +ecosystem, a NEP provides a visible place to document the proposed |
| 26 | +policy. |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +This NEP is being put forward by maintainers of Matplotlib, scikit-learn, |
| 29 | +IPython, Jupyter, yt, SciPy, NumPy, and scikit-image. |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | +Detailed description |
| 34 | +-------------------- |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | +For the purposes of this NEP we assume semantic versioning and define: |
| 37 | + |
| 38 | +*major version* |
| 39 | + A release that change the first number (e.g. X.0.0) |
| 40 | + |
| 41 | +*minor version* |
| 42 | + A release that changes the second number (e.g x.Y.0) |
| 43 | + |
| 44 | +*patch version* |
| 45 | + A release that changes the third number (e.g. x.y.Z) |
| 46 | + |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | +When a project creates a new major or minor version, we recommend that |
| 49 | +the project should support at least all minor versions of Python |
| 50 | +introduced and released in the prior 42 months ~~from their |
| 51 | +anticipated release date~~ with a minimum of 2 minor versions of |
| 52 | +Python, and all minor versions of NumPy released in the prior 24 |
| 53 | +months ~~from their anticipated release date~~ with a minimum of 3 |
| 54 | +minor versions of NumPy. |
| 55 | + |
| 56 | + |
| 57 | +The diagram:: |
| 58 | + |
| 59 | + Jan 16 Jan 17 Jan 18 Jan 19 Jan 20 |
| 60 | + | | | | | |
| 61 | + +++++|+++++++++++|+++++++++++|+++++++++++|+++++++++++|++++++++++++ |
| 62 | + | | | | |
| 63 | + py 3.5.0 py 3.6.0 py 3.7.0 py 3.8.0 |
| 64 | + |-----------------------------------------> Feb19 |
| 65 | + |-----------------------------------------> Dec19 |
| 66 | + |-----------------------------------------> Nov20 |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +shows the 42 month support windows for Python. A project with a |
| 69 | +major or minor version release in Feb19 should support py35 and newer, |
| 70 | +a project with a major or minor version release in Dec19 should |
| 71 | +support py36 and newer, and a project with a major or minor version |
| 72 | +release in Nov20 should support py37 and newer. |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +The current Python release cadence is 18 months so a 42 month window |
| 75 | +ensures that there will always be at least two minor versions of Python |
| 76 | +in the window. By padding the window by 6 months from the anticipated |
| 77 | +Python cadence we avoid the edge cases where a project releases |
| 78 | +the month after Python and would effectively only support one |
| 79 | +minor version of Python that has an installed base. |
| 80 | +This six month buffer provides resilience to minor fluctuations / |
| 81 | +delays in the Python release schedule. |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +Because Python minor version support is based on historical release |
| 84 | +dates, a 36 month time window, and a project's plans, a project can |
| 85 | +decide to drop a given minor version of Python very early in the release |
| 86 | +process. |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +While there will be some unavoidable mismatch in supported versions of |
| 89 | +Python between projects if releases occurs immediately after a |
| 90 | +minor version of Python ages out. This should not last longer than one |
| 91 | +release cycle of each of the projects, and when a given project does a |
| 92 | +minor or major release, it is guaranteed that there will be a stable |
| 93 | +release of all other projects that support the set of Python the |
| 94 | +new release will support. |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +If there is a Python 4 or a NumPy 2 this policy will have to be |
| 97 | +reviewed in light of the community's and projects' best interests. |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +Support Table |
| 101 | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +============ ====== ===== |
| 104 | +Date Python NumPy |
| 105 | +------------ ------ ----- |
| 106 | +Jan 16, 2019 3.5+ 1.13+ |
| 107 | +Mar 14, 2019 3.6+ 1.13+ |
| 108 | +Jun 08, 2019 3.6+ 1.14+ |
| 109 | +Jan 07, 2020 3.6+ 1.15+ |
| 110 | +Jun 23, 2020 3.7+ 1.15+ |
| 111 | +Jul 23, 2020 3.7+ 1.16+ |
| 112 | +Jan 13, 2021 3.7+ 1.17+ |
| 113 | +Jul 26, 2021 3.7+ 1.18+ |
| 114 | +Dec 26, 2021 3.8+ 1.18+ |
| 115 | +============ ====== ===== |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +Drop Schedule |
| 119 | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 120 | + |
| 121 | +:: |
| 122 | + |
| 123 | + On Jan 16, 2019 drop support for Numpy 1.12 (initially released on Jan 15, 2017) |
| 124 | + On Mar 14, 2019 drop support for Python 3.5 (initially released on Sep 13, 2015) |
| 125 | + On Jun 08, 2019 drop support for Numpy 1.13 (initially released on Jun 07, 2017) |
| 126 | + On Jan 07, 2020 drop support for Numpy 1.14 (initially released on Jan 06, 2018) |
| 127 | + On Jun 23, 2020 drop support for Python 3.6 (initially released on Dec 23, 2016) |
| 128 | + On Jul 23, 2020 drop support for Numpy 1.15 (initially released on Jul 23, 2018) |
| 129 | + On Jan 13, 2021 drop support for Numpy 1.16 (initially released on Jan 13, 2019) |
| 130 | + On Jul 26, 2021 drop support for Numpy 1.17 (initially released on Jul 26, 2019) |
| 131 | + On Dec 26, 2021 drop support for Python 3.7 (initially released on Jun 27, 2018) |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +Implementation |
| 135 | +-------------- |
| 136 | + |
| 137 | +We suggest that all projects adopt the following language into their |
| 138 | +development guidelines: |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | + |
| 141 | + - This project supports at least the minor versions of Python |
| 142 | + initially released 42 months prior to a planned project release |
| 143 | + date. |
| 144 | + - The project will always support at least the 2 latest minor |
| 145 | + versions of Python. |
| 146 | + - support minor versions of ``numpy`` initially released in the 24 |
| 147 | + months prior to a planned project release date or the oldest |
| 148 | + version that supports the minimum Python version (whichever is |
| 149 | + higher). |
| 150 | + - The project will always support at least the 3 latest minor |
| 151 | + versions of NumPy. |
| 152 | + |
| 153 | + The minimum supported version of Python will be set to |
| 154 | + ``python_requires`` in ``setup``. All supported minor versions of |
| 155 | + Python will be in the test matrix and have binary artifacts built |
| 156 | + for releases. |
| 157 | + |
| 158 | + The project should adjust upward the minimum Python and NumPy |
| 159 | + version support on every minor and major release, but never on a |
| 160 | + patch release. |
| 161 | + |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +Backward compatibility |
| 164 | +---------------------- |
| 165 | + |
| 166 | +No backward compatibility issues. |
| 167 | + |
| 168 | +Alternatives |
| 169 | +------------ |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +Ad-Hoc version support |
| 172 | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 173 | + |
| 174 | +A project could on every release evaluate whether to increase |
| 175 | +the minimum version of Python supported. |
| 176 | +As a major downside, an ad-hoc approach makes it hard for downstream users to predict what |
| 177 | +the future minimum versions will be. As there is no objective threshold |
| 178 | +to when the minimum version should be dropped, it is easy for these |
| 179 | +version support discussions to devolve into [bike shedding](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_Parkinson%27s_bicycle-shed_effect) and acrimony. |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | + |
| 182 | +All CPython supported versions |
| 183 | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 184 | + |
| 185 | +The CPython supported versions of Python are listed in the Python |
| 186 | +Developers Guide and the Python PEPs. Supporting these is a very |
| 187 | +clear and conservative approach. However, it means that there is 4 |
| 188 | +year lag between when new language features come into the language and |
| 189 | +when the projects are able to use them. Additionally, for projects |
| 190 | +that have a significant component of compiled extensions this requires |
| 191 | +building many binary artifacts for each release. |
| 192 | + |
| 193 | +For the case of NumPy, many projects carry workarounds to bugs that |
| 194 | +are fixed in subsequent versions of NumPy. Being proactive about |
| 195 | +increasing the minimum version of NumPy will allow downstream |
| 196 | +packages to carry fewer version-specific patches. |
| 197 | + |
| 198 | + |
| 199 | + |
| 200 | +Default version on Linux distribution |
| 201 | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 202 | + |
| 203 | +The policy could be to support the version of Python that ships by |
| 204 | +default in the latest Ubuntu LTS or CentOS/RHEL release. However, we |
| 205 | +would still have to standardize across the community which |
| 206 | +distribution we are following. |
| 207 | + |
| 208 | +By following the versions supported by major Linux distributions, we |
| 209 | +are giving up technical control of our projects to external |
| 210 | +organizations that may have different motivations and concerns than we |
| 211 | +do. |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | +N minor versions of Python |
| 214 | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 215 | + |
| 216 | +Given the current release cadence of the Python, the proposed time (42 |
| 217 | +months) is roughly equivalent to "the last two" Python minor versions. |
| 218 | +However, if Python changes their release cadence substantially, any |
| 219 | +rule based solely on the number of minor releases may need to be |
| 220 | +changed to remain sensible. |
| 221 | + |
| 222 | +A more fundamental problem with a policy based on number of Python |
| 223 | +releases is that it is hard to predict when support for a given minor |
| 224 | +version of Python will be dropped as that requires correctly |
| 225 | +predicting the release schedule of Python for the next 3-4 years. A |
| 226 | +time-based rule is only depends on things that have already happened |
| 227 | +and the length of the support window. |
| 228 | + |
| 229 | + |
| 230 | + |
| 231 | + |
| 232 | +Time window from the X.Y.1 Python release |
| 233 | +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| 234 | + |
| 235 | +This is equivalent to a few month longer support window from the X.Y.0 |
| 236 | +release. This is because X.Y.1 bug-fix release is typically a few |
| 237 | +months after the X.Y.0 release, thus a N month window from X.Y.1 is |
| 238 | +roughly equivalent to a N+3 month from X.Y.0. |
| 239 | + |
| 240 | +The X.Y.0 release is naturally a special release. If we were to |
| 241 | +anchor the window on X.Y.1 we would then have the discussion of why |
| 242 | +not X.Y.M? |
| 243 | + |
| 244 | + |
| 245 | +Discussion |
| 246 | +---------- |
| 247 | + |
| 248 | + |
| 249 | +References and Footnotes |
| 250 | +------------------------ |
| 251 | + |
| 252 | +Code to generate support and drop schedule tables :: |
| 253 | + |
| 254 | + from datetime import datetime, timedelta |
| 255 | + |
| 256 | + data = """Jan 15, 2017: Numpy 1.12 |
| 257 | + Sep 13, 2015: Python 3.5 |
| 258 | + Jun 27, 2018: Python 3.7 |
| 259 | + Dec 23, 2016: Python 3.6 |
| 260 | + Jun 07, 2017: Numpy 1.13 |
| 261 | + Jan 06, 2018: Numpy 1.14 |
| 262 | + Jul 23, 2018: Numpy 1.15 |
| 263 | + Jan 13, 2019: Numpy 1.16 |
| 264 | + Jul 26, 2019: Numpy 1.17 |
| 265 | + """ |
| 266 | + |
| 267 | + releases = [] |
| 268 | + |
| 269 | + plus42 = timedelta(days=int(365*3.5 + 1)) |
| 270 | + plus24 = timedelta(days=int(365*2 + 1)) |
| 271 | + |
| 272 | + for line in data.splitlines(): |
| 273 | + date, project_version = line.split(':') |
| 274 | + project, version = project_version.strip().split(' ') |
| 275 | + release = datetime.strptime(date, '%b %d, %Y') |
| 276 | + if project.lower() == 'numpy': |
| 277 | + drop = release + plus24 |
| 278 | + else: |
| 279 | + drop = release + plus42 |
| 280 | + releases.append((drop, project, version, release)) |
| 281 | + |
| 282 | + releases = sorted(releases, key=lambda x: x[0]) |
| 283 | + |
| 284 | + minpy = '3.8+' |
| 285 | + minnum = '1.18+' |
| 286 | + |
| 287 | + toprint_drop_dates = [''] |
| 288 | + toprint_support_table = [] |
| 289 | + for d, p, v, r in releases[::-1]: |
| 290 | + df = d.strftime('%b %d, %Y') |
| 291 | + toprint_drop_dates.append( |
| 292 | + f'On {df} drop support for {p} {v} ' |
| 293 | + f'(initially released on {r.strftime("%b %d, %Y")})') |
| 294 | + toprint_support_table.append(f'{df} {minpy:<6} {minnum:<5}') |
| 295 | + if p.lower() == 'numpy': |
| 296 | + minnum = v+'+' |
| 297 | + else: |
| 298 | + minpy = v+'+' |
| 299 | + |
| 300 | + for e in toprint_drop_dates[::-1]: |
| 301 | + print(e) |
| 302 | + |
| 303 | + print('============ ====== =====') |
| 304 | + print('Date Python NumPy') |
| 305 | + print('------------ ------ -----') |
| 306 | + for e in toprint_support_table[::-1]: |
| 307 | + print(e) |
| 308 | + print('============ ====== =====') |
| 309 | + |
| 310 | + |
| 311 | +Copyright |
| 312 | +--------- |
| 313 | + |
| 314 | +This document has been placed in the public domain. |
0 commit comments