Skip to content

datetime64 not present in intersphinx inventory #10039

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
dstansby opened this issue Nov 16, 2017 · 3 comments
Closed

datetime64 not present in intersphinx inventory #10039

dstansby opened this issue Nov 16, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@dstansby
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, over at Matplotlib we're trying to reference your docs on datetime64 objects, but it doesn't look like there is an entry in the numpy intersphinx inventory. Running the following doesn't produce any output:

python -m sphinx.ext.intersphinx 'https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/objects.inv' | grep 'datetime64'

The grep can be removed to see the whole numpy intersphinx inventory. xref matplotlib/matplotlib#9802

@shoyer
Copy link
Member

shoyer commented Nov 16, 2017

Hmm... I'm not an expert in how our docs pick up these references but this seems like something that should be easy to fix.

In the meantime, this is probably the best page to reference on datetime64: https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.13.0/reference/arrays.datetime.html

@dstansby
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe needs an autoclass entry? We fixed something similar in Matplotlib here: matplotlib/matplotlib#8175

I'll try and have a go later today.

@melissawm
Copy link
Member

Now,

$ python -m sphinx.ext.intersphinx 'https://numpy.org/doc/stable/objects.inv' | grep 'datetime64'
        numpy.datetime64                         reference/arrays.scalars.html#numpy.datetime64

so I think this issue can be closed. Please reopen if this is not the case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants