date | title | output |
---|---|---|
2018-01-25 |
Groundfish synopsis report / MP approach steering committee meeting |
pdf_document |
Review and confirm agreement with the semi-final project charter.
Ensure everyone has an up-to-date understanding of the current project status focussing mainly on the synopsis report.
Discuss a number of outstanding issues and make decisions as a group where possible.
- any proposed edits?
- R package design:
get_*()
(data is cached),plot_*()
,fit_*()
,make_synopsis()
, ... - Relies on Norm's SQL procedures if possible
- Usable for standardized data extraction/processing and plotting for one species or all species
- Elise now joined project: hook and line CPUE, maturity code table, Res Doc/SAR references, fixing my SQL, baptism by fire with advanced R/Git
- indicating survey reliability (to discuss)
- showing male/female age frequencies (slide)
- age/length frequency weighting (to discuss)
- maturity ogive fits / plotting (to discuss)
- fast commercial trawl CPUE model (to discuss)
- trawl effort plots (to discuss)
- will switch length frequency plots to (weighted) histograms
- poster + talk at Western Groundfish Conference (hopefully)
- waiting until after this meeting to update plots / layout and clean up code
- effort: yes or no? trawl and hook and line?
- CPUE: yes or no? trawl only? what spatial regions? standardized and raw? (slides)
- requires agreement on defining the 'fleet', e.g. total positive tows >= 100, at least 4 years with 4 trips with positive tows
- effort measurement for CPUE hook and line map: fishing events?
- show aging precision? (slide)
- age/lengths for unsorted commercial?
- which surveys for ages and lengths?
- male/female for ages/lengths? scaling within whole year? (slides)
- length/age frequency weighting algorithm (slides)
- which surveys for biomass indices?
- how to visualize survey reliability?
- any indication of relative biomass across spatial regions?
- unsorted commercial and survey combined for growth, weight, and maturity?
- maturity model? logistic/double-normal? binomial error or NLS to proportions? (slide)
- maturity for both sexes?
Current plan:
- taxonomic information (taxize package)
- last research document and SAR (BibTeX citation)
- TAC/management scheme
- any special notes about the data quality for the stock
- status with COSEWIC/SARA if any
- rebuilding plan/conservation measures
- your idea here
- double check proportion weighting code
- guide through technical working group formation
- TAC, management, rebuilding dataset?
- local reference databases of Res Docs / SARs?
- look over CPUE delta approach if showing CPUE / including model in package