Skip to content

Commit 48efb23

Browse files
Fix assertion failure in snapshot building
Clear any potential stale next_phase_at value from the snapshot builder which otherwise may trip an assertion check ensuring that there is no next_phase_at value. This can be reproduced by running 80 concurrent sessions like the below where $c is a loop counter (assumes there has been 1..$c databases created) : echo " CREATE TABLE replication_example(id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, somedata int, text varchar(120)); SELECT 'init' FROM pg_create_logical_replication_slot('regression_slot_$c', 'test_decoding'); SELECT data FROM pg_logical_slot_get_changes('regression_slot_$c', NULL, NULL, 'include-xids', '0', 'skip-empty-xacts', '1'); " | psql -d regress_$c >>psql.log & Backpatch down to v16. Bug: #17695 Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> Reported-by: bowenshi <zxwsbg@qq.com> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17695-6be9277c9295985f@postgresql.org Backpatch-through: v16
1 parent 4b4798e commit 48efb23

File tree

1 file changed

+5
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+5
-1
lines changed

src/backend/replication/logical/snapbuild.c

+5-1
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1955,8 +1955,12 @@ SnapBuildRestore(SnapBuild *builder, XLogRecPtr lsn)
19551955
if (TransactionIdPrecedes(ondisk.builder.xmin, builder->initial_xmin_horizon))
19561956
goto snapshot_not_interesting;
19571957

1958-
/* consistent snapshots have no next phase */
1958+
/*
1959+
* Consistent snapshots have no next phase. Reset next_phase_at as it is
1960+
* possible that an old value may remain.
1961+
*/
19591962
Assert(ondisk.builder.next_phase_at == InvalidTransactionId);
1963+
builder->next_phase_at = InvalidTransactionId;
19601964

19611965
/* ok, we think the snapshot is sensible, copy over everything important */
19621966
builder->xmin = ondisk.builder.xmin;

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)