Skip to content

Commit a1fc506

Browse files
committed
Fix an outdated and grammatically wrong comment
Authored by Amit Langote and myself independently Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGCjcH0gG-=tM7hhP7TEDmzrHMHJbPGSHtHgFmx9mnFkg@mail.gmail.com
1 parent eb8399c commit a1fc506

File tree

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

1 file changed

+3
-3
lines changed

src/backend/executor/nodeModifyTable.c

+3-3
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1517,9 +1517,9 @@ ldelete:;
15171517
* for the caller.
15181518
*
15191519
* False is returned if the tuple we're trying to move is found to have been
1520-
* concurrently updated. In that case, the caller must to check if the
1521-
* updated tuple that's returned in *retry_slot still needs to be re-routed,
1522-
* and call this function again or perform a regular update accordingly.
1520+
* concurrently updated. In that case, the caller must check if the updated
1521+
* tuple (in updateCxt->cpUpdateRetrySlot) still needs to be re-routed, and
1522+
* call this function again or perform a regular update accordingly.
15231523
*/
15241524
static bool
15251525
ExecCrossPartitionUpdate(ModifyTableContext *context,

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)