Skip to content

Commit a47ad3a

Browse files
committed
Doc: explain how to test ADMIN privilege with pg_has_role().
This has always been possible, but the syntax is a bit obscure, and our user-facing docs were not very helpful. Spell it out more clearly. Per complaint from Dominique Devienne. Back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFCRh-8JNEy+dV4SXFOrWca50u+d=--TO4cq=+ac1oBtfJy4AA@mail.gmail.com
1 parent fb4f5e5 commit a47ad3a

File tree

1 file changed

+4
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+4
-0
lines changed

doc/src/sgml/func.sgml

Lines changed: 4 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -25220,6 +25220,10 @@ SELECT has_function_privilege('joeuser', 'myfunc(int, text)', 'execute');
2522025220
are immediately available without doing <command>SET ROLE</command>,
2522125221
while <literal>SET</literal> denotes whether it is possible to change
2522225222
to the role using the <literal>SET ROLE</literal> command.
25223+
<literal>WITH ADMIN OPTION</literal> or <literal>WITH GRANT
25224+
OPTION</literal> can be added to any of these privilege types to
25225+
test whether the <literal>ADMIN</literal> privilege is held (all
25226+
six spellings test the same thing).
2522325227
This function does not allow the special case of
2522425228
setting <parameter>user</parameter> to <literal>public</literal>,
2522525229
because the PUBLIC pseudo-role can never be a member of real roles.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)