Skip to content

Commit a9a47fb

Browse files
author
Amit Kapila
committed
Fix comments in ReplicationSlotAcquire().
They were incorrectly referring to a slot parameter in ReplicationSlotAcquire() which is not passed to the API. Author: Wang Wei Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS3PR01MB6275E3CE4DC15FF8B8B80D3A9E7A2@OS3PR01MB6275.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
1 parent 7329240 commit a9a47fb

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-4
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-4
lines changed

src/backend/replication/slot.c

Lines changed: 1 addition & 4 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -465,10 +465,7 @@ ReplicationSlotAcquire(const char *name, bool nowait)
465465

466466
LWLockAcquire(ReplicationSlotControlLock, LW_SHARED);
467467

468-
/*
469-
* Search for the slot with the specified name if the slot to acquire is
470-
* not given. If the slot is not found, we either return -1 or error out.
471-
*/
468+
/* Check if the slot exits with the given name. */
472469
s = SearchNamedReplicationSlot(name, false);
473470
if (s == NULL || !s->in_use)
474471
{

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)