@@ -1089,25 +1089,25 @@ SummarizeDbaseRecord(XLogReaderState *xlogreader, BlockRefTable *brtab)
1089
1089
uint8 info = XLogRecGetInfo (xlogreader ) & ~XLR_INFO_MASK ;
1090
1090
1091
1091
/*
1092
- * We use relfilenode zero for a given database OID and tablespace OID
1093
- * to indicate that all relations with that pair of IDs have been
1094
- * recreated if they exist at all. Effectively, we're setting a limit
1095
- * block of 0 for all such relfilenodes.
1092
+ * We use relfilenode zero for a given database OID and tablespace OID to
1093
+ * indicate that all relations with that pair of IDs have been recreated
1094
+ * if they exist at all. Effectively, we're setting a limit block of 0 for
1095
+ * all such relfilenodes.
1096
1096
*
1097
1097
* Technically, this special handling is only needed in the case of
1098
- * XLOG_DBASE_CREATE_FILE_COPY, because that can create a whole bunch
1099
- * of relation files in a directory without logging anything
1100
- * specific to each one. If we didn't mark the whole DB OID/TS OID
1101
- * combination in some way, then a tablespace that was dropped after
1102
- * the reference backup and recreated using the FILE_COPY method prior
1103
- * to the incremental backup would look just like one that was never
1104
- * touched at all, which would be catastrophic.
1098
+ * XLOG_DBASE_CREATE_FILE_COPY, because that can create a whole bunch of
1099
+ * relation files in a directory without logging anything specific to each
1100
+ * one. If we didn't mark the whole DB OID/TS OID combination in some way,
1101
+ * then a tablespace that was dropped after the reference backup and
1102
+ * recreated using the FILE_COPY method prior to the incremental backup
1103
+ * would look just like one that was never touched at all, which would be
1104
+ * catastrophic.
1105
1105
*
1106
- * But it seems best to adopt this treatment for all records that drop
1107
- * or create a DB OID/TS OID combination. That's similar to how we
1108
- * treat the limit block for individual relations, and it's an extra
1109
- * layer of safety here. We can never lose data by marking more stuff
1110
- * as needing to be backed up in full.
1106
+ * But it seems best to adopt this treatment for all records that drop or
1107
+ * create a DB OID/TS OID combination. That's similar to how we treat the
1108
+ * limit block for individual relations, and it's an extra layer of safety
1109
+ * here. We can never lose data by marking more stuff as needing to be
1110
+ * backed up in full.
1111
1111
*/
1112
1112
if (info == XLOG_DBASE_CREATE_FILE_COPY )
1113
1113
{
@@ -1136,7 +1136,7 @@ SummarizeDbaseRecord(XLogReaderState *xlogreader, BlockRefTable *brtab)
1136
1136
{
1137
1137
xl_dbase_drop_rec * xlrec ;
1138
1138
RelFileLocator rlocator ;
1139
- int i ;
1139
+ int i ;
1140
1140
1141
1141
xlrec = (xl_dbase_drop_rec * ) XLogRecGetData (xlogreader );
1142
1142
rlocator .dbOid = xlrec -> db_id ;
0 commit comments