-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
Commit f3c15cb
committed
Generalize how VACUUM skips all-frozen pages.
Non-aggressive VACUUMs were at a gratuitous disadvantage (relative to
aggressive VACUUMs) around advancing relfrozenxid and relminmxid before
now. The issue only came up when concurrent activity unset some heap
page's visibility map bit right as VACUUM was considering if the page
should get counted in frozenskipped_pages. The non-aggressive case
would recheck the all-frozen bit at this point. The aggressive case
reasoned that the page (a skippable page) must have at least been
all-frozen in the recent past, so skipping it won't make relfrozenxid
advancement unsafe (which is never okay for aggressive VACUUMs).
The recheck created a window for some other backend to confuse matters
for VACUUM. If the page's VM bit turned out to be unset, VACUUM would
conclude that the page was _never_ all-frozen. frozenskipped_pages was
not incremented, and yet VACUUM couldn't back out of skipping at this
late stage (it couldn't choose to scan the page instead). This made it
unsafe to advance relfrozenxid later on.
Consistently avoid the issue by generalizing how we skip frozen pages
during aggressive VACUUMs: take the same approach when skipping any
skippable page range during aggressive and non-aggressive VACUUMs alike.
The new approach makes ranges (not individual pages) the fundamental
unit of skipping using the visibility map. frozenskipped_pages is
replaced with a boolean flag that represents whether some skippable
range with one or more all-visible pages was actually skipped.
It is safe for VACUUM to treat a page as all-frozen provided it at least
had its all-frozen bit set after the OldestXmin cutoff was established.
VACUUM is only required to scan pages that might have XIDs < OldestXmin
(unfrozen XIDs) to be able to safely advance relfrozenxid. Tuples
concurrently inserted on "skipped" pages can be thought of as equivalent
to tuples concurrently inserted on a block >= rel_pages.
It's possible that the issue this commit fixes hardly ever came up in
practice. But we only had to be unlucky once to lose out on advancing
relfrozenxid -- a single affected heap page was enough to throw VACUUM
off. That seems like something to avoid on general principle. This is
similar to an issue fixed by commit 44fa848, which taught vacuumlazy.c
to not give up on non-aggressive relfrozenxid advancement just because a
cleanup lock wasn't immediately available on some heap page.
Skipping an all-visible range is now explicitly structured as a choice
made by non-aggressive VACUUMs, by weighing known costs (scanning extra
skippable pages to freeze their tuples early) against known benefits
(advancing relfrozenxid early). This works in essentially the same way
as it always has (don't skip ranges < SKIP_PAGES_THRESHOLD). We could
do much better here in the future by considering other relevant factors.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzn6bGJGfOy3zSTJicKLw99PHJeSOQBOViKjSCinaxUKDQ@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BTgmoZiSOY6H7aadw5ZZGm7zYmfDzL6nwmL5V7GL4HgJgLF_w%40mail.gmail.com1 parent 0b018fa commit f3c15cbCopy full SHA for f3c15cb
1 file changed
+146
-163
lines changed
0 commit comments