Skip to content

Commit 17e9eca

Browse files
committed
Doc: add comments about PreventInTransactionBlock/IsInTransactionBlock.
Add a little to the header comments for these functions to make it clearer what guarantees about commit behavior are provided to callers. (See commit f929441 for context.) Although this is only a comment change, it's really documentation aimed at authors of extensions, so it seems appropriate to back-patch. Yugo Nagata and Tom Lane, per further discussion of bug #17434. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17434-d9f7a064ce2a88a3@postgresql.org
1 parent edb4ef4 commit 17e9eca

File tree

1 file changed

+8
-0
lines changed
  • src/backend/access/transam

1 file changed

+8
-0
lines changed

src/backend/access/transam/xact.c

Lines changed: 8 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3338,6 +3338,10 @@ AbortCurrentTransaction(void)
33383338
* a transaction block, typically because they have non-rollback-able
33393339
* side effects or do internal commits.
33403340
*
3341+
* If this routine completes successfully, then the calling statement is
3342+
* guaranteed that if it completes without error, its results will be
3343+
* committed immediately.
3344+
*
33413345
* If we have already started a transaction block, issue an error; also issue
33423346
* an error if we appear to be running inside a user-defined function (which
33433347
* could issue more commands and possibly cause a failure after the statement
@@ -3464,6 +3468,10 @@ CheckTransactionBlock(bool isTopLevel, bool throwError, const char *stmtType)
34643468
* a transaction block than when running as single commands. ANALYZE is
34653469
* currently the only example.
34663470
*
3471+
* If this routine returns "false", then the calling statement is
3472+
* guaranteed that if it completes without error, its results will be
3473+
* committed immediately.
3474+
*
34673475
* isTopLevel: passed down from ProcessUtility to determine whether we are
34683476
* inside a function.
34693477
*/

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)