You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The buffer allocation was correct, but looked archaic and scary:
- It was weird to calculate the buffer size before determining which
format string was used. With the same effort, we could've used the
right-sized buffer for each branch.
- Commit aa0d350 added one more possible return string ("all true
bits"), but didn't adjust the code at the top of the function to
calculate the returned string's max size. It was not a live bug,
because the new string was smaller than the existing ones, but
seemed wrong in principle.
- Use of sprintf() is generally eyebrow-raising these days
Switch to psprintf(). psprintf() allocates a larger buffer than what
was allocated before, 128 bytes vs 80 bytes, which is acceptable as
this code is not performance or space critical.
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/54c29fb0-edf2-48ea-9814-44e918bbd6e8@iki.fi
0 commit comments