Skip to content

Commit 5c53844

Browse files
committed
Fix broken Assert() introduced by 8e9a16a
Don't assert MultiXactIdIsRunning if the multi came from a tuple that had been share-locked and later copied over to the new cluster by pg_upgrade. Doing that causes an error to be raised unnecessarily: MultiXactIdIsRunning is not open to the possibility that its argument came from a pg_upgraded tuple, and all its other callers are already checking; but such multis cannot, obviously, have transactions still running, so the assert is pointless. Noticed while investigating the bogus pg_multixact/offsets/0000 file left over by pg_upgrade, as reported by Andres Freund in http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20140530121631.GE25431@alap3.anarazel.de Backpatch to 9.3, as the commit that introduced the buglet.
1 parent a2db7b7 commit 5c53844

File tree

1 file changed

+7
-1
lines changed

1 file changed

+7
-1
lines changed

src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c

Lines changed: 7 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -5326,8 +5326,14 @@ FreezeMultiXactId(MultiXactId multi, uint16 t_infomask,
53265326
* was a locker only, it can be removed without any further
53275327
* consideration; but if it contained an update, we might need to
53285328
* preserve it.
5329+
*
5330+
* Don't assert MultiXactIdIsRunning if the multi came from a
5331+
* pg_upgrade'd share-locked tuple, though, as doing that causes an
5332+
* error to be raised unnecessarily.
53295333
*/
5330-
Assert(!MultiXactIdIsRunning(multi));
5334+
Assert((!(t_infomask & HEAP_LOCK_MASK) &&
5335+
HEAP_XMAX_IS_LOCKED_ONLY(t_infomask)) ||
5336+
!MultiXactIdIsRunning(multi));
53315337
if (HEAP_XMAX_IS_LOCKED_ONLY(t_infomask))
53325338
{
53335339
*flags |= FRM_INVALIDATE_XMAX;

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)