Skip to content

Commit 8befa05

Browse files
committed
Doc: add comments about PreventInTransactionBlock/IsInTransactionBlock.
Add a little to the header comments for these functions to make it clearer what guarantees about commit behavior are provided to callers. (See commit f929441 for context.) Although this is only a comment change, it's really documentation aimed at authors of extensions, so it seems appropriate to back-patch. Yugo Nagata and Tom Lane, per further discussion of bug #17434. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17434-d9f7a064ce2a88a3@postgresql.org
1 parent 2e42296 commit 8befa05

File tree

1 file changed

+8
-0
lines changed
  • src/backend/access/transam

1 file changed

+8
-0
lines changed

src/backend/access/transam/xact.c

Lines changed: 8 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -3386,6 +3386,10 @@ AbortCurrentTransaction(void)
33863386
* a transaction block, typically because they have non-rollback-able
33873387
* side effects or do internal commits.
33883388
*
3389+
* If this routine completes successfully, then the calling statement is
3390+
* guaranteed that if it completes without error, its results will be
3391+
* committed immediately.
3392+
*
33893393
* If we have already started a transaction block, issue an error; also issue
33903394
* an error if we appear to be running inside a user-defined function (which
33913395
* could issue more commands and possibly cause a failure after the statement
@@ -3511,6 +3515,10 @@ CheckTransactionBlock(bool isTopLevel, bool throwError, const char *stmtType)
35113515
* a transaction block than when running as single commands. ANALYZE is
35123516
* currently the only example.
35133517
*
3518+
* If this routine returns "false", then the calling statement is
3519+
* guaranteed that if it completes without error, its results will be
3520+
* committed immediately.
3521+
*
35143522
* isTopLevel: passed down from ProcessUtility to determine whether we are
35153523
* inside a function.
35163524
*/

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)