Skip to content

Commit d2ee542

Browse files
committed
Fix recovery of 2PC transaction during crash recovery
A crash in the middle of a checkpoint with some two-phase state data already flushed to disk by this checkpoint could cause a follow-up crash recovery to recover twice the same transaction, once from what has been found in pg_twophase/ at the beginning of recovery and a second time when replaying its corresponding record. This would lead to FATAL failures in the startup process during recovery, where the same transaction would have a state recovered twice instead of once: LOG: recovering prepared transaction 731 from shared memory LOG: recovering prepared transaction 731 from shared memory FATAL: lock ExclusiveLock on object 731/0/0 is already held This issue is fixed by skipping the addition of any 2PC state coming from a record whose equivalent 2PC state file has already been loaded in TwoPhaseState at the beginning of recovery by restoreTwoPhaseData(), which is OK as long as the system has not reached a consistent state. The timing to get a messed up recovery processing is very racy, and would very unlikely happen. The thread that has reported the issue has demonstrated the bug using injection points to force a PANIC in the middle of a checkpoint. Issue introduced in 728bd99, so backpatch all the way down. Reported-by: "suyu.cmj" <mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com> Author: "suyu.cmj" <mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com> Author: Michael Paquier Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/109e6994-b971-48cb-84f6-829646f18b4c.mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com Backpatch-through: 11
1 parent 7d27493 commit d2ee542

File tree

1 file changed

+33
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+33
-0
lines changed

src/backend/access/transam/twophase.c

Lines changed: 33 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -2494,6 +2494,39 @@ PrepareRedoAdd(char *buf, XLogRecPtr start_lsn,
24942494
* that it got added in the redo phase
24952495
*/
24962496

2497+
/*
2498+
* In the event of a crash while a checkpoint was running, it may be
2499+
* possible that some two-phase data found its way to disk while its
2500+
* corresponding record needs to be replayed in the follow-up recovery.
2501+
* As the 2PC data was on disk, it has already been restored at the
2502+
* beginning of recovery with restoreTwoPhaseData(), so skip this record
2503+
* to avoid duplicates in TwoPhaseState. If a consistent state has been
2504+
* reached, the record is added to TwoPhaseState and it should have no
2505+
* corresponding file in pg_twophase.
2506+
*/
2507+
if (!XLogRecPtrIsInvalid(start_lsn))
2508+
{
2509+
char path[MAXPGPATH];
2510+
2511+
TwoPhaseFilePath(path, hdr->xid);
2512+
2513+
if (access(path, F_OK) == 0)
2514+
{
2515+
ereport(reachedConsistency ? ERROR : WARNING,
2516+
(errmsg("could not recover two-phase state file for transaction %u",
2517+
hdr->xid),
2518+
errdetail("Two-phase state file has been found in WAL record %X/%X, but this transaction has already been restored from disk.",
2519+
(uint32) (start_lsn >> 32),
2520+
(uint32) start_lsn)));
2521+
return;
2522+
}
2523+
2524+
if (errno != ENOENT)
2525+
ereport(ERROR,
2526+
(errcode_for_file_access(),
2527+
errmsg("could not access file \"%s\": %m", path)));
2528+
}
2529+
24972530
/* Get a free gxact from the freelist */
24982531
if (TwoPhaseState->freeGXacts == NULL)
24992532
ereport(ERROR,

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)