Skip to content

Enable Windows on Arm GitHub runners #131994

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 3, 2025

Conversation

diegorusso
Copy link
Contributor

I had to put some if conditions in different steps because these runners are not generally available hence skipping checks on forks.

Copy link
Member

@brandtbucher brandtbucher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you remove the word "Native" from each of the JIT job names, now that we don't have the "Emulated" versions anymore?

@diegorusso
Copy link
Contributor Author

The Windows on Arm runners are failing because of https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/ARM64-stack-corruption-in-1443-in-OpenS/10883345

After the upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0.16 (#131839) there is a stack corruption in OpenSSL that makes crash Python on Windows on Arm.

@diegorusso diegorusso marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2025 01:12
@diegorusso
Copy link
Contributor Author

The Windows on Arm runners are failing because of https://developercommunity.visualstudio.com/t/ARM64-stack-corruption-in-1443-in-OpenS/10883345

After the upgrade to OpenSSL 3.0.16 (#131839) there is a stack corruption in OpenSSL that makes crash Python on Windows on Arm.

This has been fixed here: #132051

@ambv ambv merged commit 0dbaeb9 into python:main Apr 3, 2025
61 checks passed
@diegorusso diegorusso deleted the windows-aarch64-runners branch April 4, 2025 13:39
seehwan pushed a commit to seehwan/cpython that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants