From ca1e19c21a1b75eaba91a8fabf1a957ab6de2e3c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andre Delfino Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 22:12:15 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] [doc] Be more clear on super() regarding multiple base classes methods (GH-21789) (cherry picked from commit 69a733bda34d413d3ad545ef3132240e5d2a7c0c) Co-authored-by: Andre Delfino --- Doc/library/functions.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Doc/library/functions.rst b/Doc/library/functions.rst index 00d40d65195200..036dca565783fe 100644 --- a/Doc/library/functions.rst +++ b/Doc/library/functions.rst @@ -1627,7 +1627,7 @@ are always available. They are listed here in alphabetical order. not found in statically compiled languages or languages that only support single inheritance. This makes it possible to implement "diamond diagrams" where multiple base classes implement the same method. Good design dictates - that this method have the same calling signature in every case (because the + that such implementations have the same calling signature in every case (because the order of calls is determined at runtime, because that order adapts to changes in the class hierarchy, and because that order can include sibling classes that are unknown prior to runtime).