Completing the built-in functions file (library/functions.po) #254
Conversation
… claudia_finish_functions
… claudia_finish_functions
|
Lo revisaré en breve |
|
me encanta invocable como substituto de callable, ¿lo has puesto en la memoria? |
|
Revisión de lo que está hasta ahora, @clacri . Buen trabajo!! |
Co-authored-by: Héctor Canto <hectorcanto@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Héctor Canto <hectorcanto@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Héctor Canto <hectorcanto@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Héctor Canto <hectorcanto@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Héctor Canto <hectorcanto@gmail.com>
muchas gracias hector, metere tus sugerencias y revisare las propuestas, y cuando esté eso y arregle el build ya lo dejo que hagan un primer merge y abro otra PR el finde para la otra mitad |
Co-authored-by: Héctor Canto <hectorcanto@gmail.com>
ya estaba puesto por el glosario pero he añadido que lo he usado así también en functions.po |
Co-authored-by: Héctor Canto <hectorcanto@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Héctor Canto <hectorcanto@gmail.com>
…S/python-docs-es into claudia_finish_functions
|
soy incapaz de encontrar lo que está causando el error en el build :( |
Co-authored-by: Cristián Maureira-Fredes <cmaureir@users.noreply.github.com>
If you look closer, the ones that I'm deleting are not related to any line number in the .rst file. That's why Sphinx was failing on these.
Note that this adds some paragraphs that I removed in the previous commit.
|
I'm going to merge this PR since it's already reviewed. I was able to fix the issue with broken link. I'm not super happy with the solution, since I'm not 100% sure to understand it, because I removed some paragraphs that I thought it were wrong and they were re-added automatically when I upgraded the translation from the sources. Anyways, good news is that we can continue working now! |
I'm aiming to finish this as soon as possible but will split in different PR. This one can be reviewed.
First part of issue #61
Closes #61