-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
[pyos][checklist] Add link to comparison with pygraphblas
in README
#438
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
I added a link to the FAQ to the README, which I think should be sufficient and I would argue is more useful (especially as we get more questions 😉 ) than using valuable space (and attention) to discuss a defunct package. |
Regarding "comparing to similar packages in the ecosystem", I think it would actually be informative to compare to e.g. |
Follows up on python-graphblas#438: >Regarding "comparing to similar packages in the ecosystem", I think it would actually be informative to compare to e.g. scipy.sparse, networkx, and igraph. I think such a comparison could go in the README and/or documentation.
Good with both of those :) |
* Update README.md Follows up on #438: >Regarding "comparing to similar packages in the ecosystem", I think it would actually be informative to compare to e.g. scipy.sparse, networkx, and igraph. I think such a comparison could go in the README and/or documentation. * Update README.md * Update README.md Co-authored-by: Erik Welch <erik.n.welch@gmail.com>
The review checklist asks me to affirm there is a comparison to similar packages in the ecosystem in the README. I think that could be as simple as linking to https://python-graphblas.readthedocs.io/en/stable/getting_started/faq.html#what-is-the-relationship-between-python-graphblas-and-pygraphblas
Close this if you have already done that, I just looked and didn't see it, but i just scanned really briefly.
Part of: pyOpenSci/software-submission#81
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: