-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15
[pyos][docs] "Monoids are also associative, so the order of the inputs does not matter." #468
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@jim22k what did you intend to write here? Monoids must be associative--rearranging parentheses--which is very important. In addition, GraphBLAS monoids are typically (and really only make sense to be) commutative, but this only a strict requirement when creating a semiring from a monoid. For example, |
I was meaning commutative. Sorry for using the wrong terminology. |
|
If you wanted a compact phrasing, you could say that
But I don't think this is actually useful for someone who doesn't already know what associative and commutative mean. I'm really sorry about the long delay, I expect to finish by Sunday. The package is in a very good shape, so there won't be requests for major changes. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Here it says,
This is a bit confusing. Did you mean to say that the monoids in py-graphblas are all commutative? Or say that grouping does not matter?
Part of: pyOpenSci/software-submission#81
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: