Skip to content

feat: add package name variant project script #1199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

codejedi365
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

  • Adds support for default implementation of uvx which matches script name with package name.
  • Resolves: Native uvx support #1195

Rationale

How did you test?

How to Verify


PR Completion Checklist

  • Reviewed & followed the Contributor Guidelines

  • Changes Implemented & Validation pipeline succeeds

  • Commits follow the Conventional Commits standard
    and are separated into the proper commit type and scope (recommended order: test, build, feat/fix, docs)

  • Appropriate Unit tests added/updated

  • Appropriate End-to-End tests added/updated

  • Appropriate Documentation added/updated and syntax validated for sphinx build (see Contributor Guidelines)

…ript

Adds support for default implementation of `uvx` which matches script name with
package name.

Resolves: python-semantic-release#1195
@codejedi365 codejedi365 force-pushed the feat/add-new-package-script branch from 3419f8f to f589b40 Compare February 22, 2025 18:18
@codejedi365 codejedi365 merged commit 1ac97bc into python-semantic-release:master Feb 22, 2025
12 checks passed
@codejedi365 codejedi365 deleted the feat/add-new-package-script branch February 22, 2025 18:25
@codejedi365
Copy link
Contributor Author

🎉 This PR has been published as part of Version 9.21.0 🎉

You can find more information about this release on the GitHub Releases page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Native uvx support
1 participant