Skip to content

[Maintenance] Proposal to carry forward the package as a community #205

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
yozachar opened this issue Apr 30, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #221
Closed

[Maintenance] Proposal to carry forward the package as a community #205

yozachar opened this issue Apr 30, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #221

Comments

@yozachar
Copy link
Collaborator

Including this thread, there are 83 #issues and 21 #PRs that were never addressed or were done so sparsely. They date as far back as 2015 and the latest commit on the master branch was 6 months ago.

@kvesteri I'm not sure what your intentions/ambitions are to maintain this package, but as a concerned developer (and yes a user) I'd like to extend my (skill set) support (in my off time) to the sustenance of this (validators) package. Anybody else, who wants to do so, may articulate it in your comments to this thread.

I suggest that this package is moved to a GitHub organization account and few people are provided with privileged/collaborative access to address the PRs and issues. If anyone has better/different ideas feel free to to voice them below.

Thanks!

@Wombatpm
Copy link

Happy to contribute

@kvesteri
Copy link
Collaborator

kvesteri commented Sep 8, 2022

Moved the repository under organization 'python-validators'

@kvesteri kvesteri closed this as completed Sep 8, 2022
@kvesteri
Copy link
Collaborator

kvesteri commented Sep 8, 2022

Added you @joe733 as a contributor

@yozachar yozachar linked a pull request Feb 2, 2023 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants