Skip to content

Bad params object[] precedence #1213

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

lostmsu
Copy link
Member

@lostmsu lostmsu commented Aug 29, 2020

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.

A bug in ArgsPrecedence caused parameters of type object[] to have the highest precedence, which affected params object[] handling, and also preferred params object[] to params string[] when a string argument was given.

Does this close any currently open issues?

#1211

Any other comments?

...

Checklist

Check all those that are applicable and complete.

  • Make sure to include one or more tests for your change
  • If an enhancement PR, please create docs and at best an example
  • Add yourself to AUTHORS
  • Updated the CHANGELOG

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 29, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1213 into backports-2.5 will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           backports-2.5    #1213   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage          86.53%   86.53%           
==============================================
  Files                  1        1           
  Lines                297      297           
==============================================
  Hits                 257      257           
  Misses                40       40           
Flag Coverage Δ
#setup_linux 64.98% <ø> (ø)
#setup_windows 72.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 96adaaa...6df753f. Read the comment docs.

@lostmsu
Copy link
Member Author

lostmsu commented Sep 13, 2020

@filmor can you review this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants