Struct default constructor #65
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…instance (via Activator.CreateInstance()) instead of having to be forced to implement an explicit constructor on the struct.
twastvedt
added a commit
to autodesk-forks/pythonnet
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2025
* Cache class definitions * Add vs code testing settings. * Old style class definition test * Fix old style test
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I updated the ConstructorBinder to support the creation of struct instances by calling the struct's default constructor which allows users to create instances of structs with no explicit constructors defined.