-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
[0.20.2] On armhf, test_novelty_true_common_tests() leads to a segfault #13052
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Stacktrace for the
Some variables (from a different session, so the pointer values do not match the stacktrace above):
Interestingly, scikit-learn/sklearn/tree/_splitter.pyx Lines 208 to 214 in fdf2f38
|
Is this python2.7? Is this reproducible under 3.6 or 3.7? |
That is 2.7. I will check tomorrow (or so) how it behaves under 3.7. |
My cythonised version of _criterion.pyx doesn't have code on line 6785. Could you provide the pyx context @olebole? |
The sigbus also happens under Python-3.7. I attach the built files _criterion.c, _splitter.c, and _tree.c. |
Does this happen when you run test_novelty_true_common_tests alone?
I don't get how this arises from that test, which shouldn't use
sklearn/tree at all.
|
That is the second one ( |
Right. I only see now that you edited the description. test_check_estimator_pairwise doesn't have any trees either, but could be related to the LOF issue? |
If that was a question to me, then I didn't understant what you want ;-) |
clearing from the milestone. |
Closing this, happy to reopen if we can reproduce it. |
Splitting #13036: On armhf, test_novelty_true_common_tests() probably leads to a segfault. I will try to get a backtrace.
Commenting this out leads to the next segfault:
and the next is
...
This list is reproducible; all other tests pass.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: