Skip to content

DOC Rework k-means assumptions example #24970

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Dec 5, 2022
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion doc/modules/clustering.rst
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ It suffers from various drawbacks:
k-means clustering can alleviate this problem and speed up the
computations.

.. image:: ../auto_examples/cluster/images/sphx_glr_plot_kmeans_assumptions_001.png
.. image:: ../auto_examples/cluster/images/sphx_glr_plot_kmeans_assumptions_002.png
:target: ../auto_examples/cluster/plot_kmeans_assumptions.html
:align: center
:scale: 50
Expand Down
187 changes: 148 additions & 39 deletions examples/cluster/plot_kmeans_assumptions.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,67 +3,176 @@
Demonstration of k-means assumptions
====================================

This example is meant to illustrate situations where k-means will produce
unintuitive and possibly unexpected clusters. In the first three plots, the
input data does not conform to some implicit assumption that k-means makes and
undesirable clusters are produced as a result. In the last plot, k-means
returns intuitive clusters despite unevenly sized blobs.
This example is meant to illustrate situations where k-means produces
unintuitive and possibly undesirable clusters.

"""

# Author: Phil Roth <mr.phil.roth@gmail.com>
# Arturo Amor <david-arturo.amor-quiroz@inria.fr>
# License: BSD 3 clause

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# %%
# Data generation
# ---------------
#
# The function :func:`~sklearn.datasets.make_blobs` generates isotropic
# (spherical) gaussian blobs. To obtain anisotropic (elliptical) gaussian blobs
# one has to define a linear `transformation`.

from sklearn.cluster import KMeans
import numpy as np
from sklearn.datasets import make_blobs

plt.figure(figsize=(12, 12))

n_samples = 1500
random_state = 170
transformation = [[0.60834549, -0.63667341], [-0.40887718, 0.85253229]]

X, y = make_blobs(n_samples=n_samples, random_state=random_state)
X_aniso = np.dot(X, transformation) # Anisotropic blobs
X_varied, y_varied = make_blobs(
n_samples=n_samples, cluster_std=[1.0, 2.5, 0.5], random_state=random_state
) # Unequal variance
X_filtered = np.vstack(
(X[y == 0][:500], X[y == 1][:100], X[y == 2][:10])
) # Unevenly sized blobs
y_filtered = [0] * 500 + [1] * 100 + [2] * 10

# Incorrect number of clusters
y_pred = KMeans(n_clusters=2, n_init="auto", random_state=random_state).fit_predict(X)
# %%
# We can visualize the resulting data:

plt.subplot(221)
plt.scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], c=y_pred)
plt.title("Incorrect Number of Blobs")
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Anisotropicly distributed data
transformation = [[0.60834549, -0.63667341], [-0.40887718, 0.85253229]]
X_aniso = np.dot(X, transformation)
y_pred = KMeans(n_clusters=3, n_init="auto", random_state=random_state).fit_predict(
X_aniso
)
fig, axs = plt.subplots(nrows=2, ncols=2, figsize=(12, 12))

plt.subplot(222)
plt.scatter(X_aniso[:, 0], X_aniso[:, 1], c=y_pred)
plt.title("Anisotropicly Distributed Blobs")
axs[0, 0].scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], c=y)
axs[0, 0].set_title("Mixture of Gaussian Blobs")

# Different variance
X_varied, y_varied = make_blobs(
n_samples=n_samples, cluster_std=[1.0, 2.5, 0.5], random_state=random_state
)
y_pred = KMeans(n_clusters=3, n_init="auto", random_state=random_state).fit_predict(
X_varied
)
axs[0, 1].scatter(X_aniso[:, 0], X_aniso[:, 1], c=y)
axs[0, 1].set_title("Anisotropically Distributed Blobs")

axs[1, 0].scatter(X_varied[:, 0], X_varied[:, 1], c=y_varied)
axs[1, 0].set_title("Unequal Variance")

axs[1, 1].scatter(X_filtered[:, 0], X_filtered[:, 1], c=y_filtered)
axs[1, 1].set_title("Unevenly Sized Blobs")

plt.suptitle("Ground truth clusters").set_y(0.95)
plt.show()

# %%
# Fit models and plot results
# ---------------------------
#
# The previously generated data is now used to show how
# :class:`~sklearn.cluster.KMeans` behaves in the following scenarios:
#
# - Non-optimal number of clusters: in a real setting there is no uniquely
# defined **true** number of clusters. An appropriate number of clusters has
# to be decided from data-based criteria and knowledge of the intended goal.
# - Anisotropically distributed blobs: k-means consists of minimizing sample's
# euclidean distances to the centroid of the cluster they are assigned to. As
# a consequence, k-means is more appropriate for clusters that are isotropic
# and normally distributed (i.e. spherical gaussians).
# - Unequal variance: k-means is equivalent to taking the maximum likelihood
# estimator for a "mixture" of k gaussian distributions with the same
# variances but with possibly different means.
# - Unevenly sized blobs: there is no theoretical result about k-means that
# states that it requires similar cluster sizes to perform well, yet
# minimizing euclidean distances does mean that the more sparse and
# high-dimensional the problem is, the higher is the need to run the algorithm
# with different centroid seeds to ensure a global minimal inertia.

plt.subplot(223)
plt.scatter(X_varied[:, 0], X_varied[:, 1], c=y_pred)
plt.title("Unequal Variance")
from sklearn.cluster import KMeans

common_params = {
"n_init": "auto",
"random_state": random_state,
}

fig, axs = plt.subplots(nrows=2, ncols=2, figsize=(12, 12))

y_pred = KMeans(n_clusters=2, **common_params).fit_predict(X)
axs[0, 0].scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], c=y_pred)
axs[0, 0].set_title("Non-optimal Number of Clusters")

y_pred = KMeans(n_clusters=3, **common_params).fit_predict(X_aniso)
axs[0, 1].scatter(X_aniso[:, 0], X_aniso[:, 1], c=y_pred)
axs[0, 1].set_title("Anisotropically Distributed Blobs")

y_pred = KMeans(n_clusters=3, **common_params).fit_predict(X_varied)
axs[1, 0].scatter(X_varied[:, 0], X_varied[:, 1], c=y_pred)
axs[1, 0].set_title("Unequal Variance")

y_pred = KMeans(n_clusters=3, **common_params).fit_predict(X_filtered)
axs[1, 1].scatter(X_filtered[:, 0], X_filtered[:, 1], c=y_pred)
axs[1, 1].set_title("Unevenly Sized Blobs")

plt.suptitle("Unexpected KMeans clusters").set_y(0.95)
plt.show()

# %%
# Possible solutions
# ------------------
#
# For an example on how to find a correct number of blobs, see
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you make the text describing the different solutions have the same order as the code examples below? It is possible to work out which bit of text is meant to go with which code snippet but I think it would be easier if the first solution described in the text was also the first code snippet, and so on.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I decided to rather re-factorize this section for clarity, even if that meant splitting the subplots. Thoughts on that?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also sounds good to me

# :ref:`sphx_glr_auto_examples_cluster_plot_kmeans_silhouette_analysis.py`.
# In this case it suffices to set `n_clusters=3`.

y_pred = KMeans(n_clusters=3, **common_params).fit_predict(X)
plt.scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], c=y_pred)
plt.title("Optimal Number of Clusters")
plt.show()

# %%
# To deal with unevenly sized blobs one can increase the number of random
# initializations. In this case we set `n_init=10` to avoid finding a
# sub-optimal local minimum. For more details see :ref:`kmeans_sparse_high_dim`.

# Unevenly sized blobs
X_filtered = np.vstack((X[y == 0][:500], X[y == 1][:100], X[y == 2][:10]))
y_pred = KMeans(n_clusters=3, n_init=10, random_state=random_state).fit_predict(
X_filtered
)

plt.subplot(224)
plt.scatter(X_filtered[:, 0], X_filtered[:, 1], c=y_pred)
plt.title("Unevenly Sized Blobs")
plt.title("Unevenly Sized Blobs \nwith several initializations")
plt.show()

# %%
# As anisotropic and unequal variances are real limitations of the k-means
# algorithm, here we propose instead the use of
# :class:`~sklearn.mixture.GaussianMixture`, which also assumes gaussian
# clusters but does not impose any constraints on their variances. Notice that
# one still has to find the correct number of blobs (see
# :ref:`sphx_glr_auto_examples_mixture_plot_gmm_selection.py`).
#
# For an example on how other clustering methods deal with anisotropic or
# unequal variance blobs, see the example
# :ref:`sphx_glr_auto_examples_cluster_plot_cluster_comparison.py`.

from sklearn.mixture import GaussianMixture

fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols=2, figsize=(12, 6))

y_pred = GaussianMixture(n_components=3).fit_predict(X_aniso)
ax1.scatter(X_aniso[:, 0], X_aniso[:, 1], c=y_pred)
ax1.set_title("Anisotropically Distributed Blobs")

y_pred = GaussianMixture(n_components=3).fit_predict(X_varied)
ax2.scatter(X_varied[:, 0], X_varied[:, 1], c=y_pred)
ax2.set_title("Unequal Variance")

plt.suptitle("Gaussian mixture clusters").set_y(0.95)
plt.show()

# %%
# Final remarks
# -------------
#
# In high-dimensional spaces, Euclidean distances tend to become inflated
# (not shown in this example). Running a dimensionality reduction algorithm
# prior to k-means clustering can alleviate this problem and speed up the
# computations (see the example
# :ref:`sphx_glr_auto_examples_text_plot_document_clustering.py`).
#
# In the case where clusters are known to be isotropic, have similar variance
# and are not too sparse, the k-means algorithm is quite effective and is one of
# the fastest clustering algorithms available. This advantage is lost if one has
# to restart it several times to avoid convergence to a local minimum.