-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.8k
MNT remove author and license in GLM files #28799
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MNT remove author and license in GLM files #28799
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've been thinking about this as well, I very much like this change!
# Authors: The scikit-learn developers # License: BSD 3 clause
I think I'm missing something, did we decide on the standard header? |
See discussion in #20813 (comment). |
@thomasjpfan WDYT? |
My big concern is still #20813 (comment) I like the end goal of having a simplified header, but I feel uneasy about removing the authors. |
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ | |||
# Authors: The scikit-learn developers | |||
# License: BSD 3 clause |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think going with this suggestion makes sense: #20813 (comment)
# License: BSD 3 clause | |
# SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't mind, then we can update the blog for this as well.
Reference Issues/PRs
Partially addresses #20813.
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
I best start with my own authorship and remove all those info from GLMs.
Any other comments?
An alternative #20813 (comment) to removing is