update README for 0.8.9

astanin · astanin · commit ee9daa24d468 · 2021-02-22T08:31:21.000+01:00
diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
@@ -679,18 +679,18 @@ At the same time, `tabulate` is comparable to other table
 pretty-printers. Given a 10x10 table (a list of lists) of mixed text and
 numeric data, `tabulate` appears to be slower than `asciitable`, and
 faster than `PrettyTable` and `texttable` The following mini-benchmark
-was run in Python 3.8.1 in Windows 10 x64:
+was run in Python 3.8.3 in Windows 10 x64:
 
     =================================  ==========  ===========
     Table formatter                      time, μs    rel. time
     =================================  ==========  ===========
-    csv to StringIO                          12.0          1.0
-    join with tabs and newlines              14.7          1.2
-    asciitable (0.8.0)                      189.6         15.8
-    tabulate (0.8.8)                        480.9         40.1
-    tabulate (0.8.8, WIDE_CHARS_MODE)       610.2         50.8
-    PrettyTable (2.0.0)                     899.8         75.0
-    texttable (1.6.3)                      1117.3         93.1
+    csv to StringIO                          12.5          1.0
+    join with tabs and newlines              15.6          1.3
+    asciitable (0.8.0)                      191.4         15.4
+    tabulate (0.8.9)                        472.8         38.0
+    tabulate (0.8.9, WIDE_CHARS_MODE)       789.6         63.4
+    PrettyTable (0.7.2)                     879.1         70.6
+    texttable (1.6.2)                      1352.2        108.6
     =================================  ==========  ===========
 
 
