Skip to content
Permalink

Comparing changes

Choose two branches to see what’s changed or to start a new pull request. If you need to, you can also or learn more about diff comparisons.

Open a pull request

Create a new pull request by comparing changes across two branches. If you need to, you can also . Learn more about diff comparisons here.
base repository: supabase/functions-js
Failed to load repositories. Confirm that selected base ref is valid, then try again.
Loading
base: v2.4.4
Choose a base ref
...
head repository: supabase/functions-js
Failed to load repositories. Confirm that selected head ref is valid, then try again.
Loading
compare: v2.4.5
Choose a head ref
  • 5 commits
  • 5 files changed
  • 3 contributors

Commits on Apr 1, 2025

  1. ignore type definitions in coverage metrics (#95)

    @olirice
    olirice authored Apr 1, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    749ff05 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Jul 1, 2025

  1. Add region as forceFunctionRegion query parameter 

    - Updated FunctionsClient to add region as both x-region header and forceFunctionRegion query param
- Used URL API to properly construct query parameters
- Added comprehensive tests to verify both header and query parameter functionality
- Updated existing test to check for both region mechanisms
- Maintains backward compatibility with existing x-region header

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
    @laktek @claude
    laktek and claude committed Jul 1, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    3d7cba0 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  2. Merge pull request #100 from supabase/add-region-query-param 

    Add region as forceFunctionRegion query parameter
    @laktek
    laktek authored Jul 1, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    8da7c47 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

Commits on Jul 2, 2025

  1. fix: include response object in FunctionsClient invoke method return 

    - Updated invoke method to include response object in both success and error cases
- Added test cases to verify response object is present in function invocations
- Ensures compliance with FunctionsResponse type definition
    @laktek
    laktek committed Jul 2, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    5662942 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history

  2. Merge pull request #101 from supabase/fix-functions-response-type 

    fix: include response object in FunctionsClient invoke method return
    @laktek
    laktek authored Jul 2, 2025
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    99cda28 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
Loading