Description
(this issue is part of the "DX" ("Developer eXperience") initiative introduced by Symfony project)
On the symfony-docs repository there is a very long discussion about the new template naming syntax.
In short, some people think that the old syntax has inconsistencies in cases like the following:
- Resource:
@AcmeBlogBundle/Resources/views/Default/common/template4.html.twig - Template:
AcmeBlogBundle : Default : common / template4.html.twig - Also valid:
AcmeBlogBundle : Default / common : template4.html.twig
Using the new namespaced Twig syntax, the template name would always be:
@AcmeBlog/Default/common/template4.html.twig
Removing the Resources/views/ part is very common and easy to understand. But removing the Bundle suffix is really strange and inconsistent with the rest of Symfony.
This problem is introduced in lines 136-138 of TwigBundle/DependencyInjection/TwigExtension.php file.
Summarized Proposals
Deprecate the current behavior (0) and choose one of the following to implement and recommend:
| Prop | Template | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | AcmeBlogBundle:Default:index.html.twig |
current |
| 1 | @AcmeBlogBundle/Default/index.html.twig |
Assumed Resources/views |
| 2 | @AcmeBlogBundle:Default/index.html.twig |
Assumed Resources/views |
| 3 | AcmeBlogBundle:Default/index.html.twig |
Assumed Resources/views |
| 4 | @AcmeBlogBundle:views/Default/index.html.twig |
Assumed Resources, could also be used consistent with routing imports |
| 5 | AcmeBlogBundle:views/Default/index.html.twig |
Assumed Resources |
| 6 | view@AcmeDemoBundle/Default/index.html.twig |
we might also have public@, config@ that could be used elsewhere |