Skip to content

[Intl] Update ICU data to 58.1 #20564

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[Intl] Update ICU data to 58.1 #20564

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jakzal
Copy link
Contributor

@jakzal jakzal commented Nov 18, 2016

Q A
Branch? 2.7
Bug fix? no
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets -
License MIT
Doc PR -

ICU 58.1 was recently released: http://site.icu-project.org/download/58

This is the first release of ICU after the project joined the Unicode® Consortium. The license changed to the Unicode license (which is similar to the ICU 1.8.1-57 license).

@nicolas-grekas
Copy link
Member

Could you please rebase on latest 2.7 to be sure that this is fine even after #20551?

@jakzal
Copy link
Contributor Author

jakzal commented Nov 19, 2016

Status: Needs work

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Dec 13, 2016

@jakzal Is this one ok to merge?

@ro0NL
Copy link
Contributor

ro0NL commented Dec 20, 2016

ICU 58.2 is out ;-)

@jakzal
Copy link
Contributor Author

jakzal commented Dec 20, 2016

I'm working on another PR that will improve tests. Once it's done I'll update this PR to 58.2 ;)

@stof
Copy link
Member

stof commented Feb 14, 2017

@jakzal what is the state of this PR ?

@jakzal
Copy link
Contributor Author

jakzal commented Feb 14, 2017

@stof I'll update it this week (not before Wednesday though)

@jakzal
Copy link
Contributor Author

jakzal commented Feb 27, 2017

Replaced by #21790

@jakzal jakzal closed this Feb 27, 2017
@jakzal jakzal deleted the icu-58.1 branch February 27, 2017 19:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants