[WebProfilerBundle] Dont use request attributes in RouterController #20622
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
👍 |
1 similar comment
|
👍 |
nicolas-grekas
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2016
…rController (nicolas-grekas) This PR was merged into the 2.7 branch. Discussion ---------- [WebProfilerBundle] Dont use request attributes in RouterController | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Branch? | 2.7 | Bug fix? | yes | New feature? | no | BC breaks? | no | Deprecations? | no | Tests pass? | yes | Fixed tickets | - | License | MIT | Doc PR | - As spotted in #20621, it makes little sense to use request attributes here, and if it were to have, the current code is broken because the returned values here have already been processed by ValueExporter in RequestDataCollector. Commits ------- 962325a [WebProfilerBundle] Dont use request attributes in RouterController
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As spotted in #20621, it makes little sense to use request attributes here, and if it were to have, the current code is broken because the returned values here have already been processed by ValueExporter in RequestDataCollector.