Skip to content

[Translation] Adding the ability do load <notes> in xliff2.0 #23947

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

Nyholm
Copy link
Member

@Nyholm Nyholm commented Aug 22, 2017

Q A
Branch? 3.4
Bug fix? ~~~~yes~~~ no (sorry)
New feature? yes
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Tests pass? yes
Fixed tickets
License MIT
Doc PR

Since #23890 we can dump <notes>. We should also have the ability to load them back.

Copy link
Member

@fabpot fabpot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Can you add some tests and a note in the CHANGELOG?

@Nyholm
Copy link
Member Author

Nyholm commented Aug 23, 2017

Thank you. Sure, I'll add some more tests and a row in the changelog

@Nyholm Nyholm force-pushed the xliff-loader-notes branch from 8fdfdca to 0a0f18d Compare August 26, 2017 08:11
@Nyholm
Copy link
Member Author

Nyholm commented Aug 26, 2017

I've update the PR now. Im ready for a final review.

@fabpot
Copy link
Member

fabpot commented Aug 26, 2017

Thank you @Nyholm.

fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2017
…iff2.0 (Nyholm)

This PR was squashed before being merged into the 3.4 branch (closes #23947).

Discussion
----------

[Translation] Adding the ability do load <notes> in xliff2.0

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | 3.4
| Bug fix?      | ~~~~yes~~~ no (sorry)
| New feature?  | yes
| BC breaks?    | no
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets |
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        |

Since #23890 we can dump `<notes>`. We should also have the ability to load them back.

Commits
-------

b0cdb53 [Translation] Adding the ability do load <notes> in xliff2.0
@fabpot fabpot closed this Aug 26, 2017
@Nyholm
Copy link
Member Author

Nyholm commented Aug 26, 2017

Thank you for merging.

@Nyholm Nyholm deleted the xliff-loader-notes branch August 26, 2017 13:19
fabpot added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2017
…pot, sanpii)

This PR was merged into the 4.0-dev branch.

Discussion
----------

[config] Add abbitily to deprecate a node

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | 3.4
| Bug fix?      | no
| New feature?  | yes
| BC breaks?    | maybe
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | symfony/symfony-docs#7794

For BC breaks, I don’t know if modifying the Xml and Yaml dumper output is considering as a BC break (it’s just a comment).

Commits
-------

31d2250 [config] Add abbitily to deprecate a node
3b6442f feature #23947 [Translation] Adding the ability do load <notes> in xliff2.0 (Nyholm)
b0cdb53 [Translation] Adding the ability do load <notes> in xliff2.0
nicolas-grekas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 29, 2017
…pot, sanpii)

This PR was merged into the 3.4-dev branch.

Discussion
----------

[config] Add abbitily to deprecate a node

| Q             | A
| ------------- | ---
| Branch?       | 3.4
| Bug fix?      | no
| New feature?  | yes
| BC breaks?    | maybe
| Deprecations? | no
| Tests pass?   | yes
| Fixed tickets | n/a
| License       | MIT
| Doc PR        | symfony/symfony-docs#7794

For BC breaks, I don’t know if modifying the Xml and Yaml dumper output is considering as a BC break (it’s just a comment).

Commits
-------

31d2250 [config] Add abbitily to deprecate a node
3b6442f feature #23947 [Translation] Adding the ability do load <notes> in xliff2.0 (Nyholm)
b0cdb53 [Translation] Adding the ability do load <notes> in xliff2.0
This was referenced Oct 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants