Formatting fix in upgrade 3.0 document #25870
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thank you @blahy. |
fabpot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 21, 2018
This PR was merged into the 2.8 branch. Discussion ---------- Formatting fix in upgrade 3.0 document | Q | A | ------------- | --- | Branch? | 2.8 | Bug fix? | no | New feature? | no | BC breaks? | no | Deprecations? | no | Tests pass? | yes | Fixed tickets | no | License | MIT | Doc PR | no Fixes formatting in upgrade file. This fix was already done in #22436 but applied to 3.2. Formatting error still exists in 2.8, 3.0, 3.1. I don't know if this was intentional. Commits ------- dc6d5e1 Formatting fix in upgrade 3.0 document
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes formatting in upgrade file.
This fix was already done in #22436 but applied to 3.2.
Formatting error still exists in 2.8, 3.0, 3.1. I don't know if this was intentional.